Amendment in Customs Rules, 2001
SRO 994(I)/2019Rules and amendments to rules
SRO 994(I)/2019 is a Customs SRO dated 6 September 2019, listed by FBR as "Amendment in Customs Rules, 2001".
The text below was extracted automatically from the text layer of the official PDF, and any machine-read text layer FBR added to a scan can contain misread characters. 1 of 9 pages are scanned images with no text layer; those pages are marked and have not been transcribed. Check the official PDF before relying on any wording or figure.
Page 1
GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
(REVENUE DIVISION)
FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE
****
Islamabad, the 4th September, 2019.
NOTIFICATION
(CUSTOMS)
S.R.O. 994(I)/2019.- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 219 of the Customs
Act, 1969 (IV of 1969), section 50 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, section 40 of the Federal Excise
Act, 2005 and section 237 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (XLIX of 2001), the Federal
Board of Revenue is pleased to direct that the following further amendments shall be made in the
Customs Rules, 2001, which have been previously published vide Notification No.S.R.O
805(I)/2019, dated the 11th July, 2019, namely:-
In the aforesaid Rules,-
(1) in rule 226,-
(i) in sub-rule (4), for the proviso, the following provisos shall be
substituted, namely:-
“Provided that the investors in Export Processing Zone shall
retain machinery for a period of five years from the date of its import
into the Zone:
Provided further that the investors in Export Processing Zone
shall be allowed to dispose of machinery in the tariff area after filing
Goods Declaration subject to the fulfillment of conditions of Import
Policy Order upon payment of duty and taxes on the following terms,
namely :-
Sr No Disposal period Duty and
taxes
(1) (2) (3)
1 If sold or otherwise disposed of before the Full
expiration of three years from the date of import
in EPZ.
Page 2
2 If sold or otherwise disposed of after three and 75%
before four years from the date of import in EPZ
3 If sold or otherwise disposed of after four and 50%
before five years from the date of import in EPZ
4 If sold or otherwise disposed of after five years 0%’
from the date of import in EPZ
“; and
(ii) in sub-rule (9), in the proviso, for the full stop at the end, a colon shall
be substituted and thereafter the following second proviso shall be
added, namely:-
“Provided further that the Chief Collector may consider any
further extensions, in exceptional circumstances, on such terms and
conditions, as he may deem appropriate.”;
(2) in rule 296, in sub-rule (1),-
(i) in clause (f), for the word “Collector”, the word “Authority” shall be
substituted; and
(ii) for clause (m), the following shall be substituted, namely:-
“(m) “Regulatory Authority” means the Collector of Customs in whose
jurisdiction the place of business or manufacturing unit of DTRE
applicant, duly registered under the Sales Tax Act, 1990, is located.
The Collector may designate an Additional Collector as Regulatory
Authority for such cases where total duty and taxes remitted under
DTRE approval is upto fifty million Rupees;”;
(3) in rules 298, 299, 300, 301 and 302, for the words “Collector”, wherever occurring,
the word “Authority” shall be substituted and for the expression “PACCS”,
wherever occurring, the expression “WeBOC” shall be substituted;
(4) after rule 301, the following new rule shall be inserted, namely:--
“301A. Appeal to the Chief Collector.- Any DTRE applicant aggrieved
by any decision or order passed under sub-rule (3) of rule 301 or any other order
Page 3
may prefer an appeal to the Chief Collector of Customs within sixty days of passing
of such decision or order;”;
(5) in rule 302A, for the words “Regulatory Collector”, the words “Regulatory
Authority” shall be substituted;
(6) in rules 304A, 306, 307(2), 307A and 307D, for the words “Collector”, wherever
occurring, the words “Authority” shall be substituted and for the expression
“PACCS”, wherever occurring, the expression “WeBOC” shall be substituted ;
(7) in rule 307E,-
(i) for the word “Collector”, wherever occurring, the word “Authority” shall be
substituted; and
(ii) after sub-rule (4), the following new sub-rule shall be added, namely:-
“(5) The Collector of Customs shall be responsible for overall
monitoring of the scheme.”;
(8) in rule 307G, for the word “Collector”, wherever occurring, the word “Authority”
shall be substituted;
(9) after rule 307H,-
(i) in Appendix-I, for the expression “PACCS”, the expression “WeBOC” shall
be substituted;
(ii) in Appendix-II, for the word “Collector`”, the word “Authority” shall be
substituted and for the expression “PACCS”, the expression “WeBOC”
shall be substituted; and
(iii) in Appendix V, for the word “Collector”, wherever occurring, the word
“Authority” shall be substituted;
(10) in rule 308,-
(i) in clause (h), after the word “Gilgit-Baltistan”, the expression “, Islamabad
Capital Territory (ICT)” shall be inserted; and
(ii) after clause (h), the following new clause shall be added, namely:-
Page 4
“(ha) “Director IOCO (Hqrs)" means the officer of Customs holding the
charge of Director IOCO (Hqrs) having jurisdiction over all offices
of the Directorate General of IOCO and the Collectorates of
Customs as duly notified by the Board;”;
(11) in rule 342,-
(i) in clause (a), for the expression “the Central Excise Act, 1944(I of 1944)”,
the expression “the Federal Excise Act, 2005” shall be substituted;
(ii) in clause (b), for the word “Collector”, the word “Regulatory Authority”
shall be substituted;
(iii) in clause (d), for the word “central”, the word “Federal” shall be
substituted;
(iv) in clause (f), for the word “Collector”, the word “Regulatory Authority”
shall be substituted;
(v) in clause (g), for the expression “344”, the expression “343” shall be
substituted;
(vi) in clause (i),-
(a) in sub-clause (a), after the word “warehouse”, the expression “for
storing of input goods, procured under clauses (i) and (ii) of sub-rule
(1) of rule 352 and goods manufactured therefrom for exports” shall be
inserted; and
(b) in sub-clause (c), for the word “Collector”, the word “Regulatory
Authority” shall be substituted;
(vii) after clause (l), the following new clause shall be inserted; namely:-
“(la) “Regulatory Authority” in relation to Manufacturing Bond means
the Additional Collector of Customs designated as the Regulatory
Authority by the Collector of Customs in whose jurisdiction the
place of business or manufacturing unit of the Manufacturing Bond
Licensee, duly registered under the Sales Tax Act, 1990, is
located;”; and
(viii) in clause (o), after the word “Collector”, the expression “or the Regulatory
Authority designated by the Collector as the case may be,” shall be
inserted;
Page 5
(12) in rule 343,-
(i) after the word “Collector” wherever occurring, the expression “or the
Regulatory Authority designated by the Collector, as the case may be”
shall be inserted;
(ii) in sub-rule (1),-
(a) for clause (a), the following shall be substituted, namely:-
“(a) the site plan of the proposed warehouse indicating the location of
the premises and the details of the total area, covered area and the
area proposed to be utilized for the manufacturing area or facility
and for storing the bonded warehoused input goods and
manufactured goods therefrom for exports, and separate other
storage areas for duty paid input goods, manufactured goods there
from, factory rejects and wastages, for domestic local sales, in case
of a manufacturing bond;”; and
(b) in clause (l), for the words “Export Promotion Bureau”, the words
“Trade Development Authority of Pakistan”, shall be substituted; and
(iii) after sub-rule (3), the following new sub-rule shall be inserted, namely:-
“(4) In case of manufacturing bond, the applicant shall apply to
the Regulatory Authority designated by the Collector of Customs having
jurisdiction in which the unit is registered under the Sales Tax Act, 1990,
and in case there are more than one unit of a proprietor, he shall apply to
the Regulatory Authority designated by the Collector of Customs where
the head office of the applicant is registered under Sales Tax Act, 1990.”;
(13) in rule 344, after the word “Collector”, the expression “or the Regulatory Authority
designated by the Collector as the case may be,” shall be inserted;
(14) in rule 345, after the word “Collector”, the expression “or the Regulatory Authority
designated by the Collector as the case may be,” shall be inserted;
Page 6
(15) in rule 345,-
(i) in sub-rule (1), for the expression “345”, the expression “344” shall be
substituted; and
(ii) after sub-rule (2), the following new sub-rule shall be inserted, namely:-
“(3) Any licensee aggrieved by any decision or order pertaining
to Manufacturing Bond may prefer an appeal to the Chief Collector of
Customs within sixty days of the passing of such decision or order.”;
(16) in rule 346,-
(i) the words “up to” shall be omitted; and
(ii) after the word “Collector”, wherever occurring, the expression “or the
Regulatory Authority designated by the Collector as the case may be,”
shall be inserted;
(17) in rule 349, in sub-rule (4), in the proviso, after the word “Collector”, the
expression “or the Regulatory Authority designated by the Collector as the case
may be,” shall be inserted;
(18) in rule 351,-
(i) in sub-rule (1), for the word “Collector”, the words “Regulatory
Authority” shall be substituted;
(ii) in sub-rule (2) for the word “Collector”, the words “Regulatory Authority”
shall be substituted and for the full stop at the end, a colon shall be
substituted and thereafter the following provisos shall be added, namely:-
“Provided that the Regulatory Authority may issue a provisional
analysis certificate till the determination of Input to Output Ratio and
wastage by IOCO or EDB, as the case may be:
“Provided further that if there is no change in previously
determined input and output ratio, then the Regulatory Authority may
uphold the previously determined input-output ratios without sending it to
IOCO or EDB.”;
(iii) in sub-rule (5), for the word “Collector”, the words “Regulatory
Authority” shall be substituted;
Page 7
(iv) for sub-rule (6), the following shall be substituted, namely:-
“(6) Improved efficiency of the manufacturing operations may
lead to improvement in consumption of input or output ratios, the licensee
shall declare the excess material at the end of the relevant year to the
Customs authorities. The concerned Deputy Collector can allow, in
writing, the consumption for export of such excess input material during
the subsequent period or allow for removal for home consumption,
provided that the warehousing period is complied with. In case of removal
for home consumption, the licensee shall file ex-bond Goods Declaration
for payment of duties and taxes leviable thereon. However, the
warehousing charges and penal surcharge as prescribed under section 98
of the Customs Act, 1969 for ex-bonding of such input material offered
due to improved plant efficiency shall not apply.”;
(v) in sub-rule (7), for the word “The” occurring for the first time “the
expression “ In case of improve efficiency, the” shall be substituted; and
(vi) for sub-rule (8), the following shall be substituted, namely:
“(8) In the case of lower efficiency, and the lower efficient ratio
is beyond three per cent, the unit may apply for redetermination of IORs.
If the change in input or output ratio is within three per cent, the input or
output ratios shall remain unchanged. The input or output ratio shall in any
event be revised every three years. The licensee will have no right of
refund.”;
(19) in rule 352,-
(i) in sub-rule (1), for the word “central” wherever occurring, the word
“federal” shall be substituted;
(ii) in sub-rules (2) and (6a), for the word “Collector”, the words “Regulatory
Authority” shall be substituted;
(iii) in sub-rule (8), for the word “Collector”, the words “Regulatory
Authority” shall be substituted and the words “or the officer authorized by
him” shall be omitted; and
(iv) in sub-rule (10), after the proviso, the following new rule shall be added,
namely:-
Page 8
“(11) The Collector of Customs shall be responsible for overall
monitoring of manufacturing bond scheme.”;
(20) in rule 355,-
(i) for the words “bill of entry”, wherever appearing, the words “Goods
Declaration” shall be substituted;
(ii) for the words “bill of export”, wherever appearing, the words “Goods
Declaration” shall be substituted;
(iii) in sub-rule (2) and sub-rule (4), for the word “Collector”, the words
“Regulatory Authority” shall be substituted;
(iv) in sub-rule (5), after the word “Collector”, the expression “or the
Regulatory Authority designated by the Collector, as the case may be,”
shall be inserted;
(v) in sub-rule (8), after the word “Collector”, the expression “or the
Regulatory Authority designated by the Collector, as the case may be,”
shall be inserted; and
(vi) in sub-rule (12), after the word “Collector”, the expression “or the
Regulatory Authority designated by the Collector, as the case may be,”
shall be inserted;
(21) in rule 356,-
(i) in sub-rule(1), after the word “Collector”, the expression “or the
Regulatory Authority designated by the Collector, as the case may be,”
shall be inserted; and
(ii) in sub-rules (2), (3) and (4), for the word “Collector”, the words
“Regulatory Authority” shall be substituted; and
(22) after rule 363,-
(i) in Appendix-I,-
(a) under the heading “Appendix-I”, for the expression “[see rule
344(1)(f)]”, the expression “[see rule 343(1)(f)]” shall be
substituted; and
Page 9
No text layer on this page. See page 9 of the official file.
Related Customs SROs on rules and amendments to rules
- SRO 1002(I)/20196 September 2019Amendment in Export Oriented Units and Small and Medium Enterprises Rules, 2008
- SRO 805(I)/201911 July 2019Amendment in Customs Rules, 2001
- SRO 747(I)/20199 July 2019Amendment in Export Oriented Units and Small and Medium Enterprises Rules, 2008
- SRO 689(I)/20191 July 2019Amendment in Baggage Rules, 2006
- SRO 653(I)/201922 June 2019Amendment in Baggage Rules
- SRO 638(I)/201920 June 2019Amendment in Customs Reward Rules, 2012